Four CPT ® codes now exist for the provision of “remote physiologic monitoring” services, but CMS has failed to define what it means by “physiologic”, causing providers and payers to question which technologies qualify for reimbursement. In the past several years, CMS has created multiple Current Procedural Terminology (CPT ®) codes for remote monitoring services. Remote monitoring is related but distinct from telemedicine by definition and modality in that it involves the interpretation of medical information without a direct, synchronous interaction between the practitioner and beneficiary.ĭespite growing interest in the use of remote monitoring, ambiguity 2 around reimbursement is still creating barriers to adoption 3 and preventing the delivery of effective, socially distanced care for multiple conditions, which could exacerbate inequitable access to digital tools. With patients unable to see their providers in person, remote monitoring, telemedicine, telehealth, and virtual care saw a 20-fold increase in use 1, and reimbursement for these services became a focal point for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). COVID-19 accelerated the adoption of remote monitoring dramatically. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, remote monitoring was gaining traction across several disease states, most notably heart disease, mental health, lung disease, and diabetes. With remote monitoring, patients can self-manage their condition from home, and providers can leverage data on the patient’s condition to inform their clinical decision-making. Remote monitoring, which uses digital health technologies to monitor patient data from anywhere, allows patients and providers to manage the chronic disease without relying on in-person appointments. The use of remote monitoring to evaluate and manage patients with chronic illness has become even more important in the wake of COVID-19.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |